![]() The most prominent thread so far appears to be the way this brouhaha links the still-emerging nature of the podcast ecosystem to the broader (and long ongoing) discussions about the formulation and governance of ethical conduct in the digital world, which remains quite lawless in many corners. The Variety piece, in particular, identified a few other accusations of plagiarism leveled against the Crime Junkie team, and the podcast has since issued a statement, sent to Variety and posted on its Facebook group, that it has decided to take down episodes where “their source material could no longer be found or properly cited.” The show did not specify just how many errant episodes would be pulled off its podcast feed, but at least five have been removed so far. “I then started listening to your other podcasts and - SURPRISE! - discovered that you don’t cite sources or credit news organizations.” Frye went on to threaten legal action unless the podcast removed the relevant episode from their distribution channels.įrye’s accusation kicked up a fair bit of attention, drawing coverage from the likes of Variety, BuzzFeed News, and even the New York Times. At one point, you quoted a portion of MY copyrighted story almost verbatim,” she wrote in a post on the podcast’s Facebook group. ![]() “You relied on my series about Kacie Woody to air your podcast, which, I would assume, profits by the sharing of crime stories. Over the past two weeks, the popular series Crime Junkie has found itself caught up in plagiarism scandal after a former Arkansas Democrat-Gazette reporter, Cathy Frye, accused the podcast of using her work on a 2002 murder without proper attribution. There’s trouble in the true-crime podcast world.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |